Source: The Straits Times Forum Page A25 18 Sep 2008
Review by: Walter Woon

Those who are well-educated and influential should be models for society. It would be a sad day for Singapore if such people think that they can choose which laws to obey and that it is morally and socially acceptable to lie on oath.

Source: The Straits Times Forum Page A35 13 Sep 2008
Letter by: Prof Arthur Lim (President, Medical Alumni Association; Former President, Singapore Medical Association)

Doctors must always remember that, in treating patients, their interests must always be foremost. A good doctor and a good lawyer, therefore, are not professionals who memorise numerous scientific and legal facts but experts who are compassionate.

Let us ensure the law on kidney transplants is changed rapidly so that those who need a transplant to live are not considered criminal.

Source: The Straits Times Forum Page A35 6 Sep 2008
Letter by: Prof Walter Woon, Attorney-General

Dr Lee wonders whether the charges against Mr Tang were a matter of political correctness. The essential point is that everyone is equal before the law…There cannot be one law for the poor and another for the rich…
If Dr Lee disagrees with the Hota, she is at liberty to campaign to have it amended. If she feels that, in some circumstances, it is perfectly acceptable to lie in a statutory declaration, she may try to persuade Parliament to change the law…

Source: The Straits Times, 5 Sep 2008, Page A29
Article by: Salma Khalik

Moves to change the law seem to be gathering momentum and will hopefully occur soon enough to save the man who started it all.
Mr Tang, who gave up his position as executive chairman of C.K. Tang following his guilty plea in the organ trading case, has a host of medical problems. Without a transplant, the 56-year-old is unlikely to live beyong a couple of years. Even with a transplant, his chances are not good…

Source: The Straits Times, 5 Sep 2008, Page A29
Article by: Lee Wei Ling

While I am happy for Mr Tang that the judge was merciful, I wonder whether our society has become so ‘politically correct’ that ‘token sentences’ are needed just to prove that all, rich or poor, are treated equally before the law…
Anyone of us would have acted as Mr Tang did if we had been placed in the same predicament. He paid a price for doing what all of us might have done.

Receiving a new kidney or heart is receiving a gift of life. Those on the receiving end are generally patients who are facing a life or death situation — people who have had to endure a long long wait for an available organ for transplant into their bodies.  The lucky ones at the front of the queue get a chance at a new lease of life. The others have to hope against hope that they will be able to live to see the day when an organ transplant becomes available for them. In many cases, it is a wait in vain.

So, it doesn’t come as a surprise to me to hear of patients trying to secure an organ illegally here in Singapore. These patients have exasperated all ways and means of getting an organ transplant legally and have found themselves in a desperate situation in which their health has deteriorated to such a stage that they are now being kept alive with the help of machines and medication. In other words, they won’t be able to live a day longer without such things. Simply put, they are at the end of life itself.

The recent news about CK Tang chairman Tang Wee Sung is an account of a man trying to prolong his life with a gift of life from a willing seller who will be well paid for parting with a kidney. It is willing-seller-willing-buyer situation. The seller willingly parts with a kidney and gets an amount of money which helps put him and his family into a better standard of living. The buyer willingly parts with a sum of money in exchange for a gift of life. Both parties stand to benefit. No one is exploited here.

But the Human Organ Transplant Act (HOTA) makes it an offence for such a transaction to take place and so Mr Tang has found himself in court. Sadly, the law is punishing a man who has done no criminal act. He has not deprived anyone of his rights. What he had done was something that anyone of us healthy chaps would also have done if put in his shoes — he was merely a dying man clutching at a straw. But though he was desperate, he had not pushed anyone underwater in order to reach the straw which could save his life.

So, I think it is time for the law to be changed so that it allows the ethical sale of organs. It would significantly increase the number of lives that can be saved. There are people among us who would disagree with my suggestion. Some may feel that everyone should queue up and get an equal chance. That’s typically Singaporean. But I wish to remind these people that this is not about queueing up for an HDB flat or the latest iPhone. Lives are at stake here. And there are people who may think that it is morally wrong. I venture to ask if these persons would still hold such a view if they find themselves in similar dire straits and stand to lose their lives.

Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan said recently that ‘even as we take action against those involved in illicit organ trading and unscrupulously exploiting the desperate and the vulnerable, we will take a sympathetic approach to the plight of the exploited donors and the basic instinct of kidney failure patients to try to live’.

But, we should do more. And quickly. Mr Tang needs our help. So do more than five hundred patients waiting for a kidney. Live and live live, I say.